Transcloud
November 3, 2025
November 3, 2025
Cloud bills rarely explode because of compute alone. Often, it’s the movement of data, especially across regions and providers, that silently drives costs up. Known as data egress, these charges affect every workload sending traffic out of its home region. In multi-cloud setups, where services exchange information between AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, the problem is magnified.
For many enterprises, egress is responsible for 20–40% of total cloud spend. A recent Flexera 2024 Cloud Cost Optimization report highlighted that over 60% of enterprises underestimate inter-region data charges, creating budget surprises. Optimizing egress is therefore critical to cloud cost management, cloud financial governance, and total cost of ownership (TCO) optimization.
This blog explores why egress costs escalate, how AWS, Azure, and GCP price it, and practical frameworks to reduce inter-region traffic without affecting performance.
Egress spend often grows faster than predicted because of architectural choices rather than sheer growth. For example, a SaaS platform replicating data across three regions for disaster recovery may unknowingly rack up $25,000–$40,000 per month in egress charges. Similarly, APIs pulling data from remote services repeatedly can add $0.08–$0.12 per GB transferred, which scales fast across millions of requests.
Common drivers of egress costs include:
A 2023 CloudZero study noted that 15–20% of cloud waste comes from unmanaged inter-region traffic alone, underlining the importance of proactive cloud spend analysis and cloud cost reduction strategies.
Understanding provider pricing is crucial for cloud cost optimization:
AWS: Charges for inter-region traffic between EC2, S3, and RDS, plus additional costs if CloudFront pulls content from origins. Typical rates: $0.02–$0.09 per GB depending on the region pair. AWS Reserved Instances and Savings Plans don’t affect egress directly, but rightsizing resources can indirectly reduce data movement.
Azure: Free zone-to-zone transfers, but region-to-region traffic incurs fees (starting at $0.02 per GB) with geographic variation. Using Azure Virtual WAN or ExpressRoute can reduce costs by 10–30% for predictable, high-volume transfers.
Google Cloud: VPC egress across regions is billed, but Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) and Cloud Interconnect can reduce costs significantly for steady traffic. Typical inter-region egress: $0.01–$0.12 per GB.
Key takeaway: Even with interconnects like AWS Direct Connect, Azure ExpressRoute, or GCP Interconnect, unmanaged egress can inflate cloud spend by 20–30% monthly, especially in multi-cloud environments.
Optimizing egress isn’t about reducing consumption—it’s about controlling movement. The following framework combines architecture design, caching, and financial governance.
Design workloads to minimize cross-region traffic:
Example: A fintech SaaS reduced monthly inter-region egress by 35% by consolidating regional workloads closer to primary data centers.
Impact: Organizations have reported $10,000–$15,000 in monthly savings just from intelligent snapshot lifecycle policies.
Studies show caching can reduce inter-region egress by up to 50% for content-heavy applications.
Example: A media company cut cross-cloud egress by $25,000 monthly using ExpressRoute with caching and local replication.
Combining visibility with governance ensures proactive cloud spend optimization, rather than reactive cost firefighting.
Data egress is often an invisible driver of cloud spend. With careful cloud cost management, multi-cloud egress planning, and smart lifecycle policies, enterprises can save 20–40% of cloud spend while maintaining performance.
A strong cloud cost optimization framework integrates architecture design, lifecycle management, caching, interconnects, and governance. Using provider-native tools along with third-party FinOps platforms like CloudHealth by VMware, Apptio Cloudability, and CloudZero can deliver end-to-end cost visibility, cloud rightsizing, and predictive spend optimization.
Proactive egress cost management is no longer optional—it’s a strategic lever for multi-cloud efficiency and sustainable growth.